General requirements of sampling:
In drawing samples, the following measures
and precautions should be observed:
[a] Samples shall not be taken at a place
exposed ... sampling instruments shall be clean
and dry when used;
[c] The material being sampled, the
sampling instrument and the bags of
samples should be free
Agricultural Officer, Hoshiarpur. The analysis report found
the contents of the sample fertilizer to be non-standard vide report dated
17.09.1996. A show cause notice ... IFFCO, it could not proved that bags, from where
the sample of fertilizer, were in fact supplied by IFFCO and on the same
General requirements of sampling:
In drawing samples, the following measures
and precautions should be observed:
[a] Samples shall not be taken at a place
exposed ... sampling instruments shall be clean
and dry when used;
[c] The material being sampled, the
sampling instrument and the bags of
samples should be free
petitioner in his appeal for retesting of the third sample of fertilizer Mono Zinc-33% in some notified laboratory.
The learned counsel for the petitioner ... Officer, Hathras had visited the sale point and had drawn the sample of fertilizer Mono Zinc-33%. The aforesaid sample was taken in three parts
composition. On the
request of the petitioner, second sample was sent to Fertilizer
Quality Control Laboratory, Pune where sample was found
"sub-standard ... followed. Samples
taken by the Inspector and sent for analysis were not
representative samples as there is no evidence that prior to
take sample
Bhana collected a sample of the fertilizers
supplied by BEC Fertilizers from the Society and sent it to Fertilizers
Quality Control Laboratory, Gwalior ... report dated
16.08.2018 given by Fertilizer Testing Laboratory, Gandhi Nagar,
Gujarat of the same fertilizer. The fertilizer was supplied by the
producer after getting
selling
fertilizers. On 02/07/2018 complainant Kapil Beda, Deputy Director
and District fertilizer inspector, Farmer Welfare and Agriculture
District Harda took samples of fertilizer ... fertilizer to applicant and applicant
sold that substandard fertilizer to farmers. Thus applicant and co-
accused cheated farmers by selling them sub-standard fertilizer
fertilizer samples as contained in
Annexure '5' to the writ application showing that the samples
were found 'standard', the fertilizer shop
further directs for preserving the third sample as well. The second testing of the sample of the fertilizer was again not found satisfactory which appears ... with a direction to the appellate authority to sent the sample of the fertilizer for third analysis to appropriate laboratory for which the requisite charges
petitioner in his appeal for retesting of the second sample of fertilizer-S.S.P.-16% in some notified laboratory.
The learned counsel ... visited the premises of the petitioner and had drawn the sample of fertilizer-S.S.P.-16%. The aforesaid sample was taken in three parts
