seized pursuant to their disclosure statements. The appellants
underwent identification parade. Their fingerprints were examined, the seized
articles were sent for chemical and DNA test ... that evidence of experts who lifted the
fingerprints of the accused (from the house) along with the testimonies
products of the Defendants i.e. VIDHATA,
KESHAV and AMOGH for DNA Fingerprinting and comparison with its own products, i.e.
BRAHMA, KRISHNA and ATAL ... research organization called the
Avestha Gengraine Technologies (hereafter AGT). Describing the DNA Fingerprinting test,
the Plaintiff submits the genetic makeup of the two seeds
filter works by recording the "hash" and creating a "fingerprint" of the
file, which has been removed; both of these ... hash of the file to the
Hash-Block Filter and the fingerprint to the "Take Down Stay Down tool". The latter too
ensures
report dated
28.04.2004 given by D.S. Negi, Technical Examiner, DNA fingerprinting
Laboratory, Govt. of India, Hyderabad is inconclusive. It is argued by the learned ... human body which was taken from the body for DNA fingerprinting. If the femur
bone really belonged to Ajay, there was no difficulty
report Ex.PW-24/A. It was submitted that the chance fingerprints sent for matching were lifted
from the electric iron found at the scene ... occurrence. The report clearly pointed to the
specimen fingerprint of Amrish matching with the chance prints. This report was not challenged
by Amrish
recovery of the skeleton. PW-31 Dr.
S.Sathyam conducted the DNA fingerprinting examination upon the femur bone
of the skeleton with the deceased ... parents to Lady Harding Hospital for
collection of blood sample for DNA fingerprinting. After collecting their blood
samples, he sent them to CFSL Kolkatta
make such
recoveries unreliable.
Chance Prints found at the site
31. Chance fingerprints were taken from the scene of the crime. These matched
the fingerprints ... used to work at the restaurant; in such a case, retrieval of fingerprints from
such a routine place is not incriminatory. Further, no finger prints
been possible only after development of recombinant DNA
Technology:
(A) DNA Fingerprinting (B) Monoclonal antibody production (C) Fermentation (D)
Vaccination
3. 82. The largest beach ... after development of recombinant (Pg. 190) (Pg. 43)
DNA technology:
(A) DNA Fingerprinting (B) Monoclonal
antibody production (C)Fermentation (D)
Vaccination
3. 82. The largest
bottles. Besides, the appellants' argument about
credibility of the fingerprint expert's report, has substance because none of the
prosecution witness deposed about
several exhibits
including the post-mortem report, forensic laboratory report and a
Fingerprint expert‟s report. Upon an overall consideration of these materials,
the trial
