Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 367 (1.10 seconds)

Selvan vs Azhagan on 25 March, 2011

should be framed: (1) Whether the opinion given by the fingerprint expert as relied by the Courts below is unreliable because she happened ... private fingerprint expert? (2) Whether the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.22 of 2001, which was a suit for specific performance, obtained
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 1 - G Rajasuria - Full Document

Chellaiah vs The State Rep. By

factor as argued by the counsel for the complainant is that the fingerprints of Accused No. 1 were found upon the tea tumblers found ... agree with the conclusion of the High Court that the fingerprint samples of the accused (used for comparison with the fingerprints on the tumblers) were
Madras High Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - N Kumar - Full Document

Arumugam vs State Of on 2 August, 2024

photographer and the sniffer dog squad. He took the assistance of the fingerprint expert and found four chance prints in the door ... Postmortem certificate. He took steps to compare the chance fingerprints taken at the scene of the occurrence with the fingerprints of the suspects available
Madras High Court Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - M S Ramesh - Full Document

Kumi @ Kumaran vs State on 19 April, 2013

place. Sniffer-dog went around the scene place. P.W.26, Ramalingam, Fingerprint Expert, lifted 7 chance fingerprints from the computer in the internet centre ... from the Inspector. On comparison, the chance prints tallied with the sample fingerprints of A-1 (Ex.P.51 report). (26) Finally
Madras High Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next