initiating a reference u/s 133(6) , from the hand
writing and fingerprint expert, the AO has duly impounded the documents, after
getting due approval ... assessee in all fairness to cross-examine the handwriting and fingerprint
expert which the assessee has chosen not to avail the said finding
Shri G.V. Rao vs Centre For Dna, Fingerprinting And ... on 31 October, 2008
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
.....
F.No.CIC/AT/A/2008/00437
Dated ... 31st October, 2008.
Appellant : Shri G.V. Rao
Respondents : Centre for DNA, Fingerprinting and Diagnostics,
Hyderabad.
This second-appeal, which came up for hearing
confirm the
identity of the applicants during documents
verification, the Biometric Attendance / Fingerprint
which were taken during the Computer Based Test
were computerized checked ... appropriate
agency. It was further stated that Biometric
Attendance / Fingerprint which were taken by the
present applicant during the Computer Based Test did
not match
Examiner of
Questioned Documents (GEQD), which indicated mismatch of
handwriting and a fingerprint expert report indicating mismatch of thumb
impressions on the OMR sheet ... holding
the charges proved primarily on the basis of the forensic and fingerprint
expert reports. Thereafter, the Disciplinary Authority passed an order
dated 29.12.2020 imposing
Examiner of
Questioned Documents (GEQD), which indicated mismatch of
handwriting and a fingerprint expert report indicating mismatch of thumb
impressions on the OMR sheet ... holding
the charges proved primarily on the basis of the forensic and fingerprint
expert reports. Thereafter, the Disciplinary Authority passed an order
dated 29.12.2020 imposing
Examiner of
Questioned Documents (GEQD), which indicated mismatch of
handwriting and a fingerprint expert report indicating mismatch of thumb
impressions on the OMR sheet ... holding
the charges proved primarily on the basis of the forensic and fingerprint
expert reports. Thereafter, the Disciplinary Authority passed an order
dated 29.12.2020 imposing
Examiner of
Questioned Documents (GEQD), which indicated mismatch of
handwriting and a fingerprint expert report indicating mismatch of thumb
impressions on the OMR sheet ... holding
the charges proved primarily on the basis of the forensic and fingerprint
expert reports. Thereafter, the Disciplinary Authority passed an order
dated 29.12.2020 imposing
Examiner of
Questioned Documents (GEQD), which indicated mismatch of
handwriting and a fingerprint expert report indicating mismatch of thumb
impressions on the OMR sheet ... holding
the charges proved primarily on the basis of the forensic and fingerprint
expert reports. Thereafter, the Disciplinary Authority passed an order
dated 29.12.2020 imposing
Examiner of
Questioned Documents (GEQD), which indicated mismatch of
handwriting and a fingerprint expert report indicating mismatch of thumb
impressions on the OMR sheet ... holding
the charges proved primarily on the basis of the forensic and fingerprint
expert reports. Thereafter, the Disciplinary Authority passed an order
dated 29.12.2020 imposing
Examiner of
Questioned Documents (GEQD), which indicated mismatch of
handwriting and a fingerprint expert report indicating mismatch of thumb
impressions on the OMR sheet ... holding
the charges proved primarily on the basis of the forensic and fingerprint
expert reports. Thereafter, the Disciplinary Authority passed an order
dated 29.12.2020 imposing
