published by the respondents, and the cut off marks for the
category of Unreserved (Male) was fixed as 65.970, and the
petitioner having secured
merit marks. No
appointment was accorded to her, though the respondents
(5 of 7)
[CW-13723/2017]
fixed 71.49 marks as cut-off marks
published by the respondents, and the cut off marks for the
category of Unreserved (Male) was fixed as 65.970, and the
petitioner having secured
published by the respondents, and the cut off marks for the
category of Unreserved (Male) was fixed as 65.970, and the
petitioner having secured
published by the respondents, and the cut off marks for the
category of Unreserved (Male) was fixed as 65.970, and the
petitioner having secured
published by the respondents, and the cut off marks for the
category of Unreserved (Male) was fixed as 65.970, and the
petitioner having secured
published by the respondents, and the cut off marks for the
category of Unreserved (Male) was fixed as 65.970, and the
petitioner having secured
published by the respondents, and the cut off marks for the
category of Unreserved (Male) was fixed as 65.970, and the
petitioner having secured
published by the respondents, and the cut off marks for the
category of Unreserved (Male) was fixed as 65.970, and the
petitioner having secured
published by the respondents, and the cut off marks for the
category of Unreserved (Male) was fixed as 65.970, and the
petitioner having secured