Maharashtra Chamber Of Housing ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 10 April, 2012
Author
Maharashtra Chamber Of Housing ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 10 April, 2012
Author
Maharashtra Chamber Of Housing ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 10 April, 2012
Author
Maharashtra Chamber Of Housing ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 10 April, 2012
Author
Maharashtra Chamber Of Housing ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 10 April, 2012
Author
Maharashtra Chamber Of Housing ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 10 April, 2012
Author
Maharashtra Chamber Of Housing ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 10 April, 2012
Author
Maharashtra Chamber Of Housing ... vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 10 April, 2012
Author
scheme,
need to vacate the area. They are also entitled to have
similar area/flat in the scheme. The provisions are made
under the Acts ... slum
dwellers or occupiers, therefore, are entitled to retain
their respective area of flats preferably on the land in
question subject to terms and conditions
April, 2010 to June
2010. Thereafter remaining 10 flats, out of 29 flats of Mevawala
Flats, have also been purchased by the respondent company ... transaction with regard to Mevawala
Flats since the flats are being sold in breach of the Disturbed
Areas Act . This letter was sent