framing charge or directing framing of charge is not held to be an
interlocutory order, the inevitable result would be a flood of Revision
Petitions ... charge is invariably assailed by the
litigants and the High Court having flooded itself with such revision petitions, would take
any number of years
framing charge or directing framing of charge is not held to be an
interlocutory order, the inevitable result would be a flood of Revision
Petitions ... charge is invariably assailed by the
litigants and the High Court having flooded itself with such revision petitions, would take
any number of years
framing charge or directing framing of charge is not held to be an
interlocutory order, the inevitable result would be a flood of Revision
Petitions ... charge is invariably assailed by the
litigants and the High Court having flooded itself with such revision petitions, would take
any number of years
framing charge or directing framing of charge is not held to be an
interlocutory order, the inevitable result would be a flood of Revision
Petitions ... charge is invariably assailed by the
litigants and the High Court having flooded itself with such revision petitions, would take
any number of years
framing charge or directing framing of charge is not held to be an
interlocutory order, the inevitable result would be a flood of Revision
Petitions ... charge is invariably assailed by the
litigants and the High Court having flooded itself with such revision petitions, would take
any number of years
framing charge or directing framing of charge is not held to be an
interlocutory order, the inevitable result would be a flood of Revision
Petitions ... charge is invariably assailed by the
litigants and the High Court having flooded itself with such revision petitions, would take
any number of years
Governor Government Of Nct Of Delhi ... vs Delhi Flood Control Mazdoor Union And ... on 7 August, 2006
Equivalent citations: 132(2006)DLT47
Author: Shiv Narayan ... Dhingra
JUDGMENT
Shiv Narayan Dhingra, J.
1. This writ petition has been directed against the award dated 13.1.1997 passed by Industrial Tribunal whereby it held
framing charge or directing framing of charge is not held to be an
interlocutory order, the inevitable result would be a flood of Revision
Petitions ... charge is invariably assailed by the
litigants and the High Court having flooded itself with such revision petitions, would take
any number of years
framing charge or directing framing of charge is not held to be an
interlocutory order, the inevitable result would be a flood of Revision
Petitions ... charge is invariably assailed by the
litigants and the High Court having flooded itself with such revision petitions, would take
any number of years
framing charge or directing framing of charge is not held to be an
interlocutory order, the inevitable result would be a flood of Revision
Petitions ... charge is invariably assailed by the
litigants and the High Court having flooded itself with such revision petitions, would take
any number of years
