Court, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate issued
a Fine Levy Warrant (in short ‘FLW’) under Section 421 of
Cr.P.C. on 01.06.2022 directing the District ... before the learned
Metropolitan Magistrate for recall/suspension of the FLW
dated 01.06.2022. The learned Metropolitan Magistrate
rejected the said application vide an order dated
proclamation and attachment warrant against the
petitioners and also issuance of FLW to surety.
2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and
learned HCGP ... forfeited. Thereafter,
ordered for issuance of proclamation against the accused
persons and FLW to surety on 18.01.2023, which is under
challenge.
4. After hearing
INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED
ORDER ISSUING N.B.W AND FLW AND FLW DATED
28/07/2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-E PASSED ... quashing the order of issuing
NBW and FLW in C.C.2514/2020, pending on the file
Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the order of issuing FLW by
the trial Court in Crl.Misc.No.50/2022 under Section ... trial Court without given an opportunity to the petitioner,
issued FLW against him which is under challenge.
5. Having heard the arguments and on perusal
section 482
of Cr.P.C for quashing the order of issuing FLW in
Crl.Misc.No.2867/2022 for recovery of the interim
compensation ... ordered by Magistrate in CC No.23117/2019
by issuing FLW under section 421 of Cr.P.C.
2. Heard the learned counsel
10841/2018 dated
14.12.2019 and further order for stay in proposed
order FLW/NBW issued by the trial court.
2. Rank of the parties ... terms of the compromise including by issuing
of an FLW U/s.431 of the Cr.P.C ."
13.1) As such, accused
gLiffs;> JiwKf flw;fiu gFjpfspy; ,Uf;Fk;
ve;jnthU fdpkKk; muRf;F nrhe;jkhdjhFk;.
me;j fdpkq;fis chpa mDkjpapd;wp vLf;Fk;
nray
gLiffs;> JiwKf flw;fiu gFjpfspy; ,Uf;Fk;
ve;jnthU fdpkKk; muRf;F nrhe;jkhdjhFk;.
me;j fdpkq;fis chpa mDkjpapd;wp vLf;Fk;
nray
Court to
order the prosecution. The learned Magistrate then
proceeded to issue FLW against the petitioner, by an order
dated
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would
contend that issuance of FLW against the petitioner is contrary ... Despite that the Court ought
not to have issued a FLW against the petitioner. The situation
now is that the accused himself has been acquitted
