remembering. Then had said
that Jagdish Sharma had been convicted in Fodder Scam. He had
further said that note-sheet was not prepared ... stated that Jagdish Sharma happens to be
convict of Fodder Scam which he came to know from newspaper.
Then had said that
even his name in the
Bastille."
27) In 'Bihar Fodder Scam', this Court, taking
into consideration the seriousness of the
47
charges
presence is required.
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
45. In Bihar Fodder Scam (Laloo Prasad case [Laloo
Prasad v. State of Jharkhand
accused in a number of cases pertaining to the Fodder Scam in the Animal Husbandry Department of Bihar but the trial judge had passed
para Nos.27 and 28 as under :-
"27. In `Bihar Fodder Scam', this Court, taking into
consideration the seriousness of the charges alleged
Supreme Court has decided the
matter regarding fodder scam cases and the jurisdiction of the court
to decide the case and has also considered ... said case,
which related to transfer of fodder scam cases, the charge sheet was
filed prior to 15.11.2000. He submits that in the present case
attendance thereon
whenever his presence is required.
- xxx-
45. In Bihar Fodder Scam (Laloo Prasad v. State of
Jharkhand, (2002) 9 SCC 372) this Court
taken notice of.
3. The case seems to be offshoot of fodder scam cases, which, under
the direction of the Patna High Court as well
attendance thereon
whenever his presence is required.
- xxx-
45. In Bihar Fodder Scam (Laloo Prasad v. State of
Jharkhand, (2002) 9 SCC 372) this Court
xxxx xxxx xxxx
44. xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx
45. In Bihar Fodder Scam (Laloo Prasad
case [Laloo Prasad v. State of Jharkhand
