with the instant R.C. Case No. 68(A)/1996 or other
R.C cases under the fodder scam, such as PhulChand Singh convicted ... fodder scam
cases. Some of the orders passed in the case of other such convicts/appellants in
R.C. Cases No. 64(A)/1996
they came to be popularly known as fodder scam cases. The investigation of these cases by the C.B.I, were being monitored ... basis of an F.l.R. in another fodder scam case and the petitioner was charge-sheeted. When the C.B.I. wanted to arrest
decision to
implicate a person as an accused in the Fodder Scam Cases was taken at the
helm of the CBI i.e. the Director ... taken at the level of the Director, CBI in all the Fodder Scam cases
and in case of difference of opinion, on the basis
suspension of sentence in respect of such convicts under different
fodder scam cases including this appellant, such as in R.C. Case ... then Chief Minister of Bihar during
the subject period of different fodder scam cases such as R.C. Case No.
20(A)/1996
jail for more than six months in
connection with cases arising out of Bihar Fodder Scam a plea was made
that the benefit granted ... these persons also. From 8.5.2001 onwards various
accused involved in Bihar Fodder Scam cases were being released on bail
by orders of this Court
dated 3.9.2010, passed in B.A. No. 4392 of
2010 in the case of Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Kumar Singh was also
relied ... more than Rs.
12.54 crores apart from other assets. In the fodder scam cases also,
all the accused persons were granted bail after remaining
also
placed reliance upon the decision of the Apex Court in the case of
Sharad Hiru Kolambe (Supra) and Vicky Alias Vikas (Supra). It
however ... matters of suspension of sentence of such convicts under the
Fodder Scam cases such as, in R.C. Case Nos. 64(A)/1996
vouchers after
obtaining allotment order was started from 30.1.1996 when
famous fodder scam case came to light in the State of Bihar
and, therefore, petitioner
appellant /petitioner would prejudice not only the
case of the respondents, but also the case of other convicts and as
such the appeal never warrants ... been stated that the appellant is also facing trial in
other fodder scam cases where his presence would be required at the
time of recording
Haryana High Court reported in 2009 Cri. L.J. 2941 in
the case of Sukhdev Singh v. State of Punjab
and also other orders passed ... reported in (2006) 1 SCC 783 and submitted that in the Fodder Scam
case the bail was granted. He therefore submitted that the present
application
