Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.
2.The second respondent referred a case in LIR.No.9 of 2021 before the
first respondent ... bond on 18.10.2021 for maintaining good behavior. But subsequently, a false case
was foisted against the petitioner. No opportunity was given to the petitioner
file of the first respondent.
2.The second respondent referred a case before the first respondent. On
30.03.2021, the petitioner executed a bond before ... revision petitioner has
executed a bond on 30.03.2021. Subsequently, a false case was foisted against the
petitioner on 24.11.2021. The petitioner was produced before
Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.
2.The second respondent referred a case in LIR.No.9 of 2021 before the
first respondent ... bond on 18.10.2021 for maintaining good behavior. But subsequently, a false case
was foisted against the petitioner. No opportunity was given to the petitioner
Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.
2.The second respondent referred a case in LIR.No.11 of 2021 before the
first respondent ... bond on 18.10.2021 for maintaining good behavior. But subsequently, a false case
was foisted against the petitioner. No opportunity was given to the petitioner
file of the first respondent.
2.The second respondent referred a case before the first respondent. On
30.03.2021, the petitioner executed a bond before ... revision petitioner has
executed a bond on 30.03.2021. Subsequently, a false case was foisted against the
petitioner on 24.11.2021. The petitioner was produced before
Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.
2.The second respondent referred a case in LIR.No.7 of 2021 before the
first respondent ... bond on 30.09.2021 for maintaining good behavior. But subsequently, a false case
was foisted against the petitioner. No opportunity was given to the petitioner
Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.
2.The second respondent referred a case in LIR.No.10 of 2021 before the
first respondent ... bond on 18.10.2021 for maintaining good behavior. But subsequently, a false case
was foisted against the petitioner. No opportunity was given to the petitioner
case against the petitioner is that on 10.11.2016, the petitioner
scolded the defacto complainant in unparliamentary words and threatened her with
dire consequences. A case ... locked the house. Due to this, the defacto complainant has foisted a false
case. The relationship between the defacto complainant and the visitors
Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.
2.The second respondent referred a case in LIR.No.10 of 2021 before the
first respondent ... bond on 18.10.2021 for maintaining good behavior. But subsequently, a false case
was foisted against the petitioner. No opportunity was given to the petitioner
Revenue Divisional Officer, Aruppukottai, Virudhunagar District.
2.The second respondent referred a case in LIR.No.7 of 2021 before the
first respondent ... bond on 30.09.2021 for maintaining good behavior. But subsequently, a false case
was foisted against the petitioner. No opportunity was given to the petitioner
