well as her mother PW-2 informed the doctor that the accused fondled the
prosecutrix‟s private part and then removed his pants and tried ... history recorded by the
doctor in MLC Ex. PW-6/A of fondling and rubbing of the prosecutrix‟s
private part by the appellant/accused
Class VII (seven), the Appellant started kissing her and
fondling her private parts. On 26-12-2020, at around 01.00-02.00
p.m. when
outside. Accused Mamta raised the
volume of T.V. and Kuldeep started fondling with her. He started kissing all
over her face and body
maternal aunt. The victim
gave a history of the perpetrator having fondled her breasts and
committing penetrative sexual assault on her, for the last ... Appellant had committed
penetrative sexual assault on her and how he had fondled her
breasts leaves no requirement of further proof with regard
Saibaba Temple, the
petitioner and his parents were not allowed to fondle the child/second respondent.
After that, the petitioner made many bonafide steps
been stated that the accused touched and fondled the chest of the child
and attempted to lift her skirt by asking whether she was wearing
family, came there
and molested her by disrobing her, gagging her and fondled
her private parts and breasts. He also inserted his finger
PHHC:072566
3
CRM-M-32178-2020
teasing and started fondling the breast of the complainant and her niece. One of them
remarked that lets
suggest as to how the
applicant on about 4 to 5 occasions fondled her breast and
touched private part during night time.
::: Uploaded ... applicant has been convicted for the offence of
having fondled the breast of the victim, touched her private part
many a times and therefore, sentenced
examination-in-chief, has categorically stated that the applicant has fondled with her and even has committed the offence as defined under Section
