prove the case.
Learned counsel for the appellants further submit that
specimen footprints of the appellants were not taken in the
presence or under ... Rajasthan Police Rule, 1956, as under:-
"6.26. Importance of footprints and track evidence.-
(1) Footprints are of the first importance in the investigation
make out that deceased Kailash had tried to run away. There are footprints of slippers and shoes of those who had followed the deceased ... joined together to murder deceased and this fact was verifiable from the footprints of slippers and shoes on the ground also indicates that deceased
house. On the basis of evidence available
in the case diary footprints stained with
blood were found in the room of Arushi but
outside that ... room bloodstained footprints
were not found. If the assailant would go
out after committing murder then certainly
his footprints would not be confined
Tanviben Pankajkumar Divetia vs State Of Gujarat on 6 May, 1997
Equivalent citations: AIR 1997
noted by the
Trial Court in the trial of Badal, no footprints were found in the
surrounding Kutcha area where the body of the deceased
under Section 4
of Kerala Identification of Prisoners Act,
finger print or footprint impressions of
suspected accused could be collected and later
compared, such prints ... Police Officer as defined therein to collect
the finger prints and footprint impressions, it
does not authorize collection of palm prints
and therefore, based
concerned. Once it is found that the evidence relating to find of footprints and fingerprints of the appellant and the recovery of the four silver
third accused was also sent for serologist report. M.O. 35 specimen footprints were sent to Forensic expert and received the report
noted by the Trial Court in the trial of Badal, no footprints
were found in the surrounding Kutcha area where the body of the
deceased
offence under Sections 302 & 201 IPC. He
deposed that neither footprints nor tyreprints were found at the
place of occurrence where the dead bodies
