Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 56 (0.71 seconds)

Dhoom Singh & Ors vs State Of Rajasthan on 6 July, 2017

prove the case. Learned counsel for the appellants further submit that specimen footprints of the appellants were not taken in the presence or under ... Rajasthan Police Rule, 1956, as under:- "6.26. Importance of footprints and track evidence.- (1) Footprints are of the first importance in the investigation
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Brahma Nand on 14 February, 2017

Yash Kumar (PW-2), at the instance of the accused Brahmanand. Further, footprints and fingerprints were taken from the spot. After completion of investigation ... Janana Mahal, Alwar was found broken and after entering therein the footprints and fingerprints were also found. But the learned trial Court has erred
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next