Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 97 (0.66 seconds)

T. Murugan vs State on 26 May, 2011

Jaipur. PW-14 Iqbal Ahmed prepared an enlarged photograph of the chance footprint and compared it with the specimen footprint of the three accused ... opinion was that the chance footprints matched with that of the appellant Karuppan. 7. After considering the materials on record and the depositions
Delhi High Court Cites 22 - Cited by 2 - S R Bhat - Full Document

Dhoom Singh & Ors vs State Of Rajasthan on 6 July, 2017

prove the case. Learned counsel for the appellants further submit that specimen footprints of the appellants were not taken in the presence or under ... Rajasthan Police Rule, 1956, as under:- "6.26. Importance of footprints and track evidence.- (1) Footprints are of the first importance in the investigation
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ram Lal & Anr vs State on 29 January, 2014

Appeal No. 936/2005 3 not reliable, footprints evidence was also not trust-worthy, Dr. Vijay Soni (PW-12) does not say anything that which ... also been argued by the learned Public Prosecutor that the evidence of footprints may not have been proved to be foolproof but other evidence
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - G Mathur - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next