Madhav Sureka vs Footprints Childcare Pvt Ltd And Anr on 16 January, 2026
$~6
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ... 1776/2025
MR. MADHAV SUREKA .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Vedika Sureka, Advocate
versus
FOOTPRINTS CHILDCARE PVT LTD AND ANR
.....Respondents
Through: Ms. Surabhi Tyagi, Advocate
CORAM
Ravi Kumar Jain vs
Footprints Childcare Private Limited on 10 March, 2026
CS (Comm) No.616/2021: Ravi Kumar Jain V/s
Footprints Childcare ...
[email protected]
.....Plaintiff
(Through Shri Munish Gupta, Advocate)
Versus
1.
Footprints Childcare Private Limited,
Through Its Directors.
Registered Office At: 308, Aggarwal Towers
building or group of buildings.
27. A promoter cannot convey only the footprint beneath
columns and staircase and retain all open areas despite those open ... petitioner's
certificates does not separate what is actual building footprint and
what is appurtenant surrounding land. It aggregates rights by
percentage rather than
also the evidence of PW18
is unbelievable that the bloodstained photo footprint was taken from the house
of the deceased. Even assuming that the bloodstained ... mahazar witnesses, who have spoken
about the recovery of bloodstained footprints from the scene of occurrence
under Ex.P32. PW20
assessee also relied on the decision of the Mumbai
Tribunal in Reliance Footprint Ltd. v. ACIT (41 taxmann.com
553) wherein project development expenditure incurred ... Bombay High Court in CIT v. Reliance Footprint Ltd., ITA No.
948 of 2014.
59. Reliance was also placed on:
Reliance Fresh Ltd. v. ACIT
hawala-esque fund-transfer architecture. They dovetail seamlessly with the
digital footprints (WhatsApp chats) and financial trails earlier delineated,
erecting a hermetic prima facie case ... facilitative or upstream roles lacking this
applicant's confessional admissions, digital footprints, and custodial
confessions. Parity, thus, stands repugnant. Bail cannot become a
competition
exchequer; Critical operational decisions sustaining the
syndicate's architecture. This digital footprint constitutes prima facie
proof of the Applicant's nexus with ... Statements of material witnesses under
Sections 164 CrPC/183 BNSS; Voluminous digital footprints from
seized devices;Irrefutable linkage in BS Diaries (Beat Sheets/Station
Diaries
deceased, yet could not explain who
cleaned the blood stains and footprints. Complainant (PW-2) further
admitted that neither he nor any family member attempted ... were blood stains on the floor and bedding but no blood-stained
footprints in the room or outside, which was not possible if the deceased
incident. He also submitted that the police has collected
certain footprints and searched several CCTV footages, but is
not able to correlate any accused with ... report is available on
record and which has corroborated the chance footprint
which match with present petitioner.
5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused
Sh.Rakesh,Gurgaon vs Income Tax Officer, Gurgaon on 24 February, 2026
IN THE INCOME
