Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 133 (0.73 seconds)

Santa Bandu vs Emperor on 6 April, 1909

agree with him. The next piece of evidence is that of footprints on the flat roof of the house of one Tukarama. These are said ... that point is not convincing. The panchnama made as to the footprint mentions two, whereas Baji, the officiating Kulkarni, has given evidence which is conflicting
Bombay High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 6 - Full Document

Atanu Purkayastha vs Sajjad Ahmed Abdul Aziz Mugal @ Pathan ... on 10 November, 2025

unexplained injuries on his person.................................................................................... 71 K. On CCTV footage / fingerprint & footprints............................... 73 L. Postmortem Report................................................................ 74 M. On applicability of Section ... hypothesis of Sajjad's guilt. No casts were prepared of the footprints. As per the fingerprint report, no fingerprints were found, which is highly
Bombay High Court Cites 75 - Cited by 0 - A S Gadkari - Full Document

Sajjad Ahmed Abdul Aziz Mugal @ Pathan vs The State Of Maharashtra on 10 November, 2025

unexplained injuries on his person.................................................................................... 71 K. On CCTV footage / fingerprint & footprints............................... 73 L. Postmortem Report................................................................ 74 M. On applicability of Section ... hypothesis of Sajjad's guilt. No casts were prepared of the footprints. As per the fingerprint report, no fingerprints were found, which is highly
Bombay High Court Cites 75 - Cited by 0 - A S Gadkari - Full Document

The State Of Maharashtra vs Sajjad Ahmed Abdul Aziz Mugal @ Pathan on 10 November, 2025

unexplained injuries on his person.................................................................................... 71 K. On CCTV footage / fingerprint & footprints............................... 73 L. Postmortem Report................................................................ 74 M. On applicability of Section ... hypothesis of Sajjad's guilt. No casts were prepared of the footprints. As per the fingerprint report, no fingerprints were found, which is highly
Bombay High Court Cites 75 - Cited by 0 - A S Gadkari - Full Document

Atanu Purkayastha vs Sajjad Ahmed Abdul Aziz Mugal @ Pathan ... on 10 November, 2025

unexplained injuries on his person.................................................................................... 71 K. On CCTV footage / fingerprint & footprints............................... 73 L. Postmortem Report................................................................ 74 M. On applicability of Section ... hypothesis of Sajjad's guilt. No casts were prepared of the footprints. As per the fingerprint report, no fingerprints were found, which is highly
Bombay High Court Cites 75 - Cited by 0 - A S Gadkari - Full Document

Modi Entertainment Network And Anr. vs W.S.G. Cricket Pte. Limited on 30 January, 2002

field of satellite transmission, that when signals are transmitted by satellite, the footprint of the satellite, invariably strays into areas which may not be covered ... different territories, there are inherent limitations and restrictions in controlling a satellite footprint. This phenomena is called "natural over-spill" which is universally
Bombay High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - P Upasani - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next