Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1101 (1.10 seconds)

Kumar vs State By on 28 October, 2022

victim, has given opinion that there was no recent forceful intercourse which is entirely contra to the evidence of the victim. Further the Investigating Officer ... hymen of the victim was not intact and there was no forceful intercourse. Further, the victim has completed the age of 14 years
Madras High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - P Velmurugan - Full Document

Mohanraj @ Mohan vs State Rep. By

from A3- Dhanalakshmi @ Lakshmi by paying Rs.3,000/- and forced them into commercial sex trade. A2 handed over these girls ... compromising position with A3; that thereafter, A3 forced PW2 to engage in sexual intercourse with A17. A17 is said to have played an active role
Madras High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

K.Palanisamy vs / on 11 November, 2022

with intent, she be forced or seduced to illicit intercourse with another person. The prosecution evidence does not satisfy the above requirements. Therefore, the conviction ... that the minor girl was procured to force her to have illicit intercourse with another person, hence, no offence is made out. Undoubtedly this submission
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next