Farhan vs State & Anr on 11 May, 2022
Farhan vs State & Anr on 11 May, 2022
Author: Rajiv Shakdher
Bench: Rajiv Shakdher
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 1513 (1.34 seconds)Chota Raju @ Raju Machuwa vs The State Of Jharkhand on 16 August, 2022
testimonies
about the fact that either she was forced or seduced to illicit
intercourse or knowing it likely that she would be forced or seduced ... with any person against her will or she was forced or seduced
to illicit intercourse, was found in the testimonies of the victim girl
The State Of Maharashtra vs Govind @ Gotumama Balkrishna Joshi on 10 January, 2022
middle portion of thighs, hymen was ruptured and there
was forceful intercourse within 4 to 6 hours. He further invites our
attention to the contents ... hymen swollen, vaginal
examination not possible and there is sign of forceful intercourse
attempted. He further invites our attention to the CA report and
submits
Jaisingh vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 19 October, 2022
gagged her mouth, forcibly took her to nearby bushes and
committed forceful sexual intercourse with her. At the time of
incident, mother of the prosecutrix ... conclusion that on
the date of incident, appellant committed forceful sexual intercourse
with prosecutrix, who was a member belonging to Scheduled Tribe
community
Kumar vs State By on 28 October, 2022
victim, has given
opinion that there was no recent forceful intercourse which is entirely
contra to the evidence of the victim. Further the Investigating Officer ... hymen of the victim was not intact and there was no
forceful intercourse. Further, the victim has completed the age of 14
years
Gore Lal vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 14 September, 2022
hands and fist and on the
point of knife, committed forceful sexual intercourse with her. Based upon
2
report, offence punishable under Section ... from village of prosecutrix.
There is an allegation of commission of forceful sexual intercourse, but
PW-4/Dr. Pratibha Jain who examined the prosecutrix
X vs The Principal Secretary Health And ... on 29 September, 2022
X vs The Principal Secretary Health And ... on 29 September, 2022
Author: D.Y. Chandrachud
Charu Soneja vs State(Nct Of Delhi) And Ors on 3 January, 2022
substance by her
father-in-law with the intention of having forceful intercourse with her.
9. It is contended that a major portion of stridhan
Raisingh vs The State Of M.P. on 6 September, 2022
contradictory to the medical evidence. Prosecutrix deposed
that the appellant committed forceful intercourse with her, while Dr.
Sarojiniben Patel stated in her MLC report that
Indrasen vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 13 May, 2022
wants to live together and it is not a case
of forceful sexual intercourse. It is only as a result of love and affair between ... which goes to show that
SAN
Digitally signed by SHALINI LANDGE
forceful intercourse have been done. Filing of charge-sheet is not disputed by
Date