that the tenderness and odema to vagina might be trial of forceful
intercourse. In the cross-examination, she deposed that she had taken
history ... opined that there might be trial of forceful
intercourse. Her evidence in cross-examination that her opinion is not
conclusive, will be of no help
pretext of false
promise of marriage or whether he has committed
forceful intercourse with the victim in spite of her
protest. The prosecution came with ... victim-prosecutrix is another fatal
blow to the story of forceful intercourse. The
learned counsel rightly pointed out the allegations
made in that earlier report
clock position.
There was no sign of forceful intercourse. He exhibited the medical
examination report of the survivor as Exhibit-3.
In his cross-examination ... reveal if there is a forceful act. She agreed that the statement of the survivor
regarding forceful sexual intercourse did not corroborate the medical report
intercourse with him and then forcibly had such
intercourse. These are mutually destructive
contentions, since, if there is consent, there cannot be
alleged forceful intercourse ... after the first physical intercourse and even later
the allegation was forceful intercourse without any
consent. In all the three instances it was the
allegation
police and in her statement
before the Magistrate that while committing forceful intercourse upon her, the
accused Nitul had used a condom.
She stated that ... statement
under Section 164 Cr.PC that while committing forceful intercourse upon her, the
accused Nitul had used a condom.
He stated that
intercourse with him and then forcibly had such
intercourse. These are mutually destructive
contentions, since, if there is consent, there cannot be
alleged forceful intercourse ... after the first physical intercourse and even later
the allegation was forceful intercourse without any
consent. In all the three instances it was the
allegation
vinyl cavity at the
time of examination;
d) Sign of forceful intercourse was present;
e) Pathological report shows spermatozoa was present on
the vaginal Swab ... appellants pushed her inside, undressed her and committed sexual
intercourse forcefully upon her. After that, another appellant also
committed sexual assault upon the victim
prosecution
that on 10th April, 2015, the accused had forceful sexual intercourse with her
and Accused Nos. 2 and 3 were standing on the common ... stated that on 10th April, 2015, the accused - Akshay had
forceful sexual intercourse with her, and the accused nos. 2 and 3 were
standing
vinyl cavity at the
time of examination;
d) Sign of forceful intercourse was present;
e) Pathological report shows spermatozoa was present on
the vaginal Swab ... appellants pushed her inside, undressed her and committed sexual
intercourse forcefully upon her. After that, another appellant also
committed sexual assault upon the victim
vinyl cavity at the
time of examination;
d) Sign of forceful intercourse was present;
e) Pathological report shows spermatozoa was present on
the vaginal Swab ... appellants pushed her inside, undressed her and committed sexual
intercourse forcefully upon her. After that, another appellant also
committed sexual assault upon the victim
