Code. Therein the appellant, R. H. Bhutani, was forcibly dispossessed of the Cabin in the morning of June 11, 1966. The respondents had threatened ... that the eviction is a forcible one. Mis-representation and improper threats besides these are sufficient to constitute forcible dispossession^, and there were these
further observed that the appellants, who were in possession, had been forcibly dispossessed. He, however, expressed the view that it would not be proper ... strenuously contended that the respondents had no right to forcibly dispossess the appellants and the appellants had proprietary rights in the Bazar in dispute which
alleged that Munshi Singh, Gurdatta Singh and Maharban Singh had forcibly dispossessed him of a plot of land by erecting a building over ... under Section 145, Criminal P.C., by a person complaining of forcible dispossession, if, for no reason or fault of the applicant, the Magistrate
took formal delivery of possession through court, will not amount to forcible dispossession of the present plaintiff. When a compromise decree was passed ... prove further that there was forcible dispossession. The contention of the respondent that the applicant in order to get relief must prove eviction cannot
property at the hands of the petitioners, who were threatening to forcibly dispossess them. He submits that in the suit filed by the petitioners ... which also shows that the respondents apprehend that they might be forcibly dispossessed by the petitioners from the land in dispute. The police report
home.
55. In India, the Courts frown upon an act of forcible dispossession. Even the owner has to take recourse to legal methods for seeking ... this Court held that the law forbids forcible dispossession, even with the best of title. In Krishna Ram Mahale v. Shobha Venkat
Article 300A , can be inferred in that Article.
12.3. To forcibly dispossess a person of his private property, without following due process of law, would ... deprivation.
12.7. In this case, the Appellant could not have been forcibly dispossessed of her property without any legal sanction, and without following due process
also been sought to be submitted that since the respondents have forcibly dispossessed the writ petitioners and utilized their private land for public purpose then ... case of Vidya Devi (Supra) has observed as under:-
12.3. To forcibly dispossess a person of his private property, without following due process
Article 300A , can be inferred in that Article.
12.3 To forcibly dispossess a person of his private property, without following due process of law, would ... supplied)
12.7. In this case, the Appellant could not have been forcibly dispossessed of her property without any legal sanction, and without following due process
Rajesh Kumar and others, restraining the respondents-defendants from forcibly dispossessing him except in due process of law. The case of the appellant-plaintiff ... Supreme Court held that law forbids forcibly dispossession, even with the best of title.
33. Further, in the case of 'Krishan Ram Mahale (dead
