employees cost.
Disallowance of notional forex loss:
42. Ground No.2 relates to treatment of forex gain as operating income.
The TPO has treated ... mentioned that the Appellant bears Forex
risk, the Forex loss should be considered as operating in nature. Before the
ld.CIT(A) the Appellant seem
employees cost.
Disallowance of notional forex loss:
42. Ground No.2 relates to treatment of forex gain as operating income.
The TPO has treated ... mentioned that the Appellant bears Forex
risk, the Forex loss should be considered as operating in nature. Before the
ld.CIT(A) the Appellant seem
gains is operating in nature. Further, although,
Safe Harbor Rules defines operating expenditure and operating
income and also it has excluded forex loss ... should be treated as non-operating in nature because as per
the definition of operating income or operating expenditure,
forex loss/gain has been specifically
gains is operating in nature. Further, although,
Safe Harbor Rules defines operating expenditure and operating
income and also it has excluded forex loss ... should be treated as non-operating in nature because as per
the definition of operating income or operating expenditure,
forex loss/gain has been specifically
gains is operating in nature. Further, although,
Safe Harbor Rules defines operating expenditure and operating
income and also it has excluded forex loss ... should be treated as non-operating in nature because as per
the definition of operating income or operating expenditure,
forex loss/gain has been specifically
gains is operating in nature. Further, although,
Safe Harbor Rules defines operating expenditure and operating
income and also it has excluded forex loss ... should be treated as non-operating in nature because as per
the definition of operating income or operating expenditure,
forex loss/gain has been specifically
should be treated as non-operating in
nature because as per the definition of operating income or
operating expenditure, forex loss/gain has been specifically ... operating expenditure or operating
income. We find that in order to consider any items of
expenditure/income as operating or non-operating in nature,
mere
should be treated as non-operating in
nature because as per the definition of operating income or
operating expenditure, forex loss/gain has been specifically ... operating expenditure or operating
income. We find that in order to consider any items of
expenditure/income as operating or non-operating in nature,
mere
should be treated as non-operating in
nature because as per the definition of operating income or
operating expenditure, forex loss/gain has been specifically ... operating expenditure or operating
income. We find that in order to consider any items of
expenditure/income as operating or non-operating in nature,
mere
gains is operating in nature. Further, although,
Safe Harbor Rules defines operating expenditure and operating
income and also it has excluded forex loss ... should be treated as non-operating in nature because as per
the definition of operating income or operating expenditure,
forex loss/gain has been specifically
