till 2013. This retirement deed dt. 01.04.1985 is executed on a
stamp paper purchased on 30.04.1985, which is unregistered.
Obviously it is not legal ... highly suspicious. Respondent No. 2
has alleged that it is a forged document. He claimed that his name
::: Uploaded on - 13/11/2017 ::: Downloaded
APPLN424.2017
dt.19.06.2014 on notarized stamp paper and thereby agreed to
refund the amount within one year. Shaikh Mujtaba (R2) waited ... attributed to the
applicants.
(vi) The so-called agreement dt. 19.06.2014 is forged and
fabricated. It does not bear the signature of Iqbal
Salim
APPLN424.2017
dt.19.06.2014 on notarized stamp paper and thereby agreed to
refund the amount within one year. Shaikh Mujtaba (R2) waited ... attributed to the
applicants.
(vi) The so-called agreement dt. 19.06.2014 is forged and
fabricated. It does not bear the signature of Iqbal
Salim
view of audit objection and,
therefore, two cheques and nine blank stamps were taken from
respondent No. 2 on assurance that those would be returned ... issued two cheques bearing No. 155407 and
155415 and nine stamp papers but, on discussion with his relatives
and friends, he realized his mistake
view of audit objection and,
therefore, two cheques and nine blank stamps were taken from
respondent No. 2 on assurance that those would be returned ... issued two cheques bearing No. 155407 and
155415 and nine stamp papers but, on discussion with his relatives
and friends, he realized his mistake
Nishigandha S/O Ramnath Chobhe vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 13 September
Mukesh Kumar Godara vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 21 September, 2017
Author
