Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 90 (2.06 seconds)

Rajiv Tomar vs Union Of India on 1 September, 2008

appointing authority as under:- (i) In the event of declaration or document found false/bogus before giving appointment, the candidature should be cancelled by issuing ... dismissed/removed from service. In the event of any forgery/cheating or any documents found false/bogus at any stage, besides taking action as mentioned
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 27 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Dinesh Kumar Raheja vs Gnctd on 11 April, 2022

Tribunal may be pleased to take cognizance of the matter of forgery and fraud committed by the members of the selection committee/Secretariat branch ... appoint a high level committee to investigate the matter of forgery/creation of false documents in the official records by the members of the selection
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rajendra Mehto vs M/O External Affairs on 21 September, 2017

conclusion that he has obtained the Scheduled Tribe certificate by forgery or by any unlawful means. The genuineness or correctness of the Caste Certificate cannot ... disciplinary authority can proceed against the employee for having furnished the false certificate. The cancellation of the caste certificates has its own prescribed procedure
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Smt. Saroj vs The Commissioner on 24 February, 2010

discerns is that in a case where the very basis of forged documents has been established either by a caste committee or by a duly ... given participation that a case has been registered against them for false/forged documents. Unless the conclusion of the trial in the facts and circumstances
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 29 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Raj Kumar Uppal vs Govt. Of Nctd on 31 March, 2016

reached specially when very specific and glaring allegation of forgery and grave misconduct were made against the applicant. 12. What cannot possibly be disputed here ... embezzlement and fabrication of false records; 4. If the alleged misconduct is grave and a large number of documents and the statement of witnesses
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

G.P. Bhatia vs Union Of India Through on 16 January, 2014

self-proclaimed crusader against corruption, transfer scam, etc. and he was leveling false allegations of victimization and criminal conspiracy against Disciplinary Authority and his senior ... Applicant to prove those allegations. As regards the allegation of forgery of his signatures, he was given sufficient opportunity to prove the same during
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Also At vs Union Of India on 5 August, 2014

victimize the applicant by involving his name deliberately into a false case of forgery and fabrication and to jeopardize his career prospects. It is submitted ... question to the CFSL for determination of forgery and has, in fact, by producing documents that suit best to its own case has confirmed that
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next