Hegde And Golay Limited vs State Bank Of India on 19 November, 1985
unsatisfactory state of these documents.
"9.9) ............I have permitted the plea of forgery to be raised in the course of arguments, since, it cannot
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 745 (2.30 seconds)Southern Sales And Services vs Sauermilch Design And Handels Gmbh on 2 December, 2021
defendants who were required to establish the plea of
forgery, did not take any further steps to secure a definite
opinion of the handwriting expert ... view on the basis of
materials available on record on the plea of forgery raised
by the defendants. Thus, point No.(i) is answered
Anthony Francis vs B. Shivamurthy on 16 August, 2019
chit transaction. The accused did not set up any plea
of forgery of the signature on the Cheque. Under the
said circumstances, the learned Magistrate ... said
circumstances, the respondent was entitled to take up the
plea of forgery and get the same substantiated through
4
handwriting expert under Section
State Bank Of India vs Hegde And Golay Limited on 26 July, 1985
State Bank Of India vs Hegde And Golay Limited on 26 July, 1985
Equivalent citations
State Bank Of Mysore vs The Karnataka Industrial Cooperative ... on 18 August, 2014
collecting banker had sent them to
the clearing house. The factum of forgery came to the
knowledge of the plaintiff only when the accounts were ... learned counsel
while submitting his arguments, more particularly when
the plea of forgery and fraud requires a little higher
degree of proof. But the fact
Shantamma W/O Nagappa Tavaragondi vs Bhavanevva W/O Mallappa Tavaragondi on 23 February, 2018
4109/2012
: 25 :
Will so as to establish the plea of forgery. The appellants
having not taken any steps in this regard, cannot be heard
K R Rajashekar Reddy vs State Of Karnataka on 19 March, 2024
shall also be liable to fine.
468. Forgery for purpose of cheating.--Whoever
commits forgery, intending that the document or electronic
record forged shall ... complainant and have been in place for six years,
the plea of forgery is also loosely laid against the petitioners as the
petitioners prima facie
Mr Rajesh N Jagdale vs State Of Karnataka on 8 December, 2022
that kind and it was a forged
document. Therefore, the allegation is forgery. The contents
of the complaint cannot on the face of it hold ... agitated
only before the civil Court, before which Court, even the plea of
forgery can be an issue that could be framed. If the civil
Shri Ashwin Digmabar Raikar vs Shri. Pyaro Baig on 29 January, 2024
arbitration
clause but the respondent has also taken up a plea of fraud and
forgery and contended that the sale agreement is a concocted ... this appeal make
a distinction between serious allegations of
forgery/fabrication in support of the plea of fraud as
opposed to "simple allegations
Basavareddappa S/O Fakirappa ... vs Mallikarjunagouda S/O ... on 7 February, 2011
contended that, in view of the plea of forgery
of the signature of F.S.Hasaraddi and the alleged
concoction of ExP1, the onus