Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 188 (0.03 seconds)

R.Chandrasekaran vs / on 21 December, 2012

public servant, conversion of valuable security by forgery and use of the valuable security so forged as genuine, forgery of documents like Application cum pledge ... forging the signature of the co-depositor thereby had committed offence punishable under Section 468 of I.P.C. Using the forged FDR (valuable security
Madras High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

R.Chandrasekaran vs / on 21 December, 2012

Bank, committed breach of trust, fabricated valuable security and other documents. Using the forged documents as genuine, misappropriated the money and obtained pecuniary advantage ... genuine RIP, the charge of using the forged valuable security as genuine stands proved. From the testimony
Madras High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

R.Chandrasekaran vs / on 21 December, 2012

document as genuine and forgery of valuable security, Ex.P.10 the FD receipt been valuable security is forged by the accused by making false ... made out. 25. The charge that, he used this forged valuable security FD receipt bearing No.173815 (Ex.P.10) as genuine to cheat
Madras High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

R.Chandrasekaran vs / on 21 December, 2012

breach of trust is proved. To avail loan, false document with forged signature of the depositor produced by the appellant as a genuine document thus ... clear to the naked eyes they are forged. Thus, the charge of forging valuable security to attract offence under section
Madras High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

R.Chandrasekaran vs / on 21 December, 2012

Chandrasekaran (accused). Thereby, the accused committed offences punishable for cheating, forgery, forging valuable security for the purpose of cheating, using the forged documents as genuine ... entries in the loan ledger and other documents had forged the valuable security and used the forged document as genuine to cheat the bank
Madras High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ramesh Mathur vs State on 7 March, 2012

property come under the purview of Valuable Security as per Section 30 IPC and were alleged to be forged by the petitioner, consequently Section ... added during the investigation. "Section 467. Forgery of valuable security, will, etc. "Whoever forges a document which purports to be a valuable security
Delhi High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - M L Mehta - Full Document

R.Chandrasekaran vs / on 21 December, 2012

thereby committed forgery of valuable security, which attracts the offence under Section 467 IPC. d). The said forged documents were used for the purpose ... Section 467 and 468 of I.P.C. The fabricated valuable security and forged document used as genuine to cheat the Bank. He sanctioned loan
Madras High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . on 7 June, 2012

forgery was committed by the accused in respect of a valuable security defined u/s 30 IPC. For this we have to analyze ... solvency proof. Therefore, it is held that the accused forged the valuable security. 11. On the other hand, accused has not been able to bring
Delhi District Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next