Paramasivam vs / on 19 July, 2018
conspiracy and substantive offences of cheating, impersonation, forgery of documents, forging valuable security, using valuable security as genuine for the purpose of cheating besides
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 378 (0.04 seconds)Dumpala Madhusudhana Reddy vs The Central Bureau Of Investigation on 16 June, 2022
registered.
Prima facie cognizable offences of criminal conspiracy, cheating, forgery
of valuable security, forged for the purpose of cheating, using forged
documents as genuine
R.Muthusamy vs / on 11 July, 2018
right. Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code prescribes Punishment For Forging Valuable Security to receive or deliver any money.
37. In this case ... forgery of a document purporting to be a valuable security ( Section 467 , IPC) and using of forged document as genuine ( Section 471 , IPC). While considering
In Re: Sivananda Mudali vs Unknown on 20 October, 1925
finding the appellant has been convicted of using as genuine a forged valuable security knowing it to be forged.
2. The contention
P.Venkateswarlu vs The Inspector Of Police on 6 February, 2018
under PMEGP scheme enclosing a forged lease agreement
purported to be valuable security, forged with the help of Shri
P.Venkateswaralu (A-1) & Shri ... agreement of Smt.Packialakshmi. Shri P.Venkateswaralu accepted the
forged documents purported to be valuable security, knowing fully well that
the documents are forged
R.Chandrasekaran vs / on 21 December, 2012
public servant,
conversion of valuable security by forgery and use of the valuable security so
forged as genuine, forgery of documents like Application cum pledge ... forging the
signature of the co-depositor thereby had committed offence punishable under
Section 468 of I.P.C. Using the forged FDR (valuable security
T.Kandasamy vs The Deputy Superintendent Of Police on 3 July, 2023
evidence. That apart, the charges
like falsification of document, forging the valuable security and using it as
genuine, are well proved by examining the disputed ... guilt of the accused in respect of charges of
cheating, forging valuable security and using the valuable security as genuine
for misappropriating the Bank funds
R.Chandrasekaran vs / on 21 December, 2012
breach of trust is proved. To avail loan, false
document with forged signature of the depositor produced by the appellant as a
genuine document thus ... clear to
the naked eyes they are forged. Thus, the charge of forging valuable security to
attract offence under section
R.Chandrasekaran vs / on 21 December, 2012
document as genuine and forgery of valuable security, Ex.P.10 the FD receipt been
valuable security is forged by the accused by making false ... made out.
25. The charge that, he used this forged valuable security FD receipt
bearing No.173815 (Ex.P.10) as genuine to cheat
R.Chandrasekaran vs / on 21 December, 2012
Bank, committed breach of trust, fabricated valuable
security and other documents. Using the forged documents as genuine,
misappropriated the money and obtained pecuniary advantage ... genuine RIP, the charge
of using the forged valuable security as genuine stands proved. From the testimony