reiterated the
allegations made in the complaint and oath. He also got marked
6 C.C.No.2318/2017
documents ... DOCUMENTS MARKED ON BEHALF OF THE COMPLAINANT:
COMPLAINANT:-
Ex.P1 : Authorisation
Ex.P2 : Agreement
Ex.P3 : Stockiest appointment format
comparison of questioned signature marked Q1 with
the admitted signatures marked A1 to A3, similarities are
observed in formation of some of the characters such ... Securities(P) Ltd Vs. Dharam Dutt page no. 9 of Pages 14
formation of initial letter 'D', nature of its vertical staff, retrace
Venkateshappa
Witnesses examined on behalf of the Accused:
Nil
Documents marked on behalf of the Complainant:
Ex.P.1 & Ex.P2 Cheques ... Madiwala PS
Documents marked on behalf of the Accused:
Nil
XIX ACMM, B'lore
17 C.C.NO.21014/2015
Formatted: Centered, Line spacing
year 2011. Swetha has also taken her signature
to the blank format of on demand promissory note and
consideration receipt brought by her. But, Swetha ... which are marked as Ex.D10 to
Ex.D11 respectively. The legal notice sent by the complainant
which is marked
accused, the
complainant examined himself as P.W.1 and got marked the
documents at Ex.P.1 to Ex.P7. The accused ... document is not in a formate form
acceptable as evidence. Despite the trial court got admitted
and marked in favour of the complainant. The same
business friends. The complainant had paid amounts to
accused for the formation of layout. After completion of layout the
accused was liable ... accused has denied the case of the complainant,
the complainant marked Ex.P.1 cheque. Ex.P.1a is the signature
of accused. The said
business friends. The complainant had paid amounts to
accused for the formation of layout. After completion of layout the
accused was liable ... accused has denied the case of the complainant,
the complainant marked Ex.P.1 cheque. Ex.P.1a is the signature
of accused. The said
accused not adduced evidence. Ex.D. 1 to D3 are
marked on his behalf through cross examination of PW1.
6. The learned counsel for complainant ... business friends. The complainant had paid amounts to
accused for the formation of layout. After completion of layout the
accused was liable
Bank,
Ex.P5 is RPAD acknowledgment, for statutory notice dated
05.05.2003 marked as Ex.P6, Ex.P7 is reply by accused ... From perusal of Ex.P11, it is seen that date of
formation of partnership is 26.09.2001. Only the date of
registration of firm
complainant and denied the
issuance of cheque Ex.P11 and signature marked at
Ex.P11(a), but in the cross-examination ... borrowed any amount from complainant as
loan for the formation of layout and he has not issued
cheque for return of the said amount
