Trade Marks Act, 1999 ."
5. The Petitioner is the registered owner of the word mark "BLUE
HEAVEN", its formative marks as well ... mark on account of long, open and exclusive user in the
mark "BLUE HEAVEN" and its various formative marks/variants.
12. The sales
BLUE HEAVEN GET BOLD" (word as well as formative marks). The
Plaintiff adopted the mark "BLUE HEAVEN" in the year ... trade under the said mark. The Plaintiff further
adopted the distinctive mark "BLUE HEAVEN GET BOLD"
(word/formative marks) in the year
plaintiff in respect of the trademark
BURGER KING and other formative marks, is prima
facie not tenable. There is no reasonable prospect of
the defendants ... trademark
'Burger King' and other Burger King formative marks of the
Plaintiff or any other marks deceptively similar thereto,
including / Burger King Family
plaintiff in respect of the trademark
BURGER KING and other formative marks, is prima
facie not tenable. There is no reasonable prospect of
the defendants ... trademark
'Burger King' and other Burger King formative marks of the
Plaintiff or any other marks deceptively similar thereto,
including / Burger King Family
plaintiff in respect of the trademark
BURGER KING and other formative marks, is prima
facie not tenable. There is no reasonable prospect of
the defendants ... trademark
'Burger King' and other Burger King formative marks of the
Plaintiff or any other marks deceptively similar thereto,
including / Burger King Family
plaintiff in respect of the trademark
BURGER KING and other formative marks, is prima
facie not tenable. There is no reasonable prospect of
the defendants ... trademark
'Burger King' and other Burger King formative marks of the
Plaintiff or any other marks deceptively similar thereto,
including / Burger King Family
mark 'BLUE HEAVEN GET BOLD' and its formative marks. The
Plaintiff is a company engaged in the business of manufacturing, marketing
and trading ... registered
owner of the word mark 'BLUE HEAVEN', its formative marks as well as
the following marks which were adopted
using the plaintiffs mark VIVO or any other
deceptively similar mark, logo or device
amounting to
passing off of plaintiffs mark VIVO ... Vivo Mobile Communication Co.
Ltd., being 'VIVO' and VIVO formative marks, as specified in the plaint, are
stated to have been
device,
which is identical or deceptively similar to the '24
Formative Marks' as set out in the suit, which
would amount to infringement ... identical or deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs'
'24 Formative Marks'. Defendants are also
directed to suspend their mobile application and
website
changed its
mark. A perusal of the record shows that, as of June, 2021, the Defendant
continued to use the mark 'GS STAR ... DENIM 3301. The mark 'G-STAR' and its
formative marks have also been registered by the Plaintiff in Classes
