claim of the
appellant based on F.R. 22-B. The proviso to F.R. 22-B
reads as follows:-
"Provided that ... fixation of pay under rule 22(1) (a) (i) or
under rule 22(1) (b) (i) read with rule 22(1)(a)(i), within
fixation of pay in
the post of Headmaster as provided under FR.22(b). It is true that the
petitioner herein was promoted as Headmaster
M/S Indus Towers Ltd vs The Deputy Commissioner Of Commercial ... on 7 September, 2011
upon FR 27 and FR 22B(2), has rendered a categorical finding, which would run as follows:
Applying the said FR 22-B
Pradeep Kumar Singh vs Union Of India & Ors. on 4 May, 2021
Equivalent citations
anomaly should be directly as a result of the application of FR 22-C. For example, if even in the lower post the junior officer ... Assistant (DR) is fixed normally at the minimum under FR 22-B (2). In such cases, the senior direct recruit cannot claim pay parity with
year 2001-02 and in the subsequent
years, by quoting FR 22 B Rule 2 (1) wherein it states that both the Junior
and Senior
personal to them. Hence, FR 22 is not applicable to the
applicants for the reasons:
(i) As per FR 22, for removal of anomaly ... Assistant (DR) is fixed normally at the
minimum under FR 22-B (2). In such cases,
the senior direct recruit cannot claim pay
parity with
junior - (a) As a
result of application of FR 22-C.[Now FR 22(I) (a)(1)].-In
order to remove the anomaly ... Assistant (DR) is fixed normally at the
minimum under FR 22-B (2). In such cases, the senior
direct recruit cannot claim pay parity with
staff promoted will
also have their pay fixed under Rule 2018-B [FR 22(C)]- R.I.
Therefore, since change of scale of pay from
