same
cannot be confused with the increment under FR 26 and FR 24,
which has been denied to the contractual employees in terms ... qualifying service. In
this regard, it would be useful to reproduce FR 24 and FR 26:
"F.R.24. An increment shall ordinarily
there are no other changes in regard
to allowing annual increments. FR 24 and FR 26 support the cause of the
applicants. Annual increment ... truthful, it is the respondents who have infringed Rule FR 21 (a). Even FR
24 was quoted by the respondents to defend their decision
there are no other changes in regard
to allowing annual increments. FR 24 and FR 26 support the cause of the
applicants. Annual increment ... truthful, it is the respondents who have infringed Rule FR 21 (a). Even FR
24 was quoted by the respondents to defend their decision
there are no other changes in regard
to allowing annual increments. FR 24 and FR 26 support the cause of the
applicants. Annual increment ... truthful, it is the respondents who have infringed Rule FR 21 (a). Even FR
24 was quoted by the respondents to defend their decision
there are no other changes in regard
to allowing annual increments. FR 24 and FR 26 support the cause of the
applicants. Annual increment ... truthful, it is the respondents who have infringed Rule FR 21 (a). Even FR
24 was quoted by the respondents to defend their decision
there are no other changes in regard
to allowing annual increments. FR 24 and FR 26 support the cause of the
applicants. Annual increment ... truthful, it is the respondents who have infringed Rule FR 21 (a). Even FR
24 was quoted by the respondents to defend their decision
there are no other changes in regard
to allowing annual increments. FR 24 and FR 26 support the cause of the
applicants. Annual increment ... truthful, it is the respondents who have infringed Rule FR 21 (a). Even FR
24 was quoted by the respondents to defend their decision
there are no other changes in regard
to allowing annual increments. FR 24 and FR 26 support the cause of the
applicants. Annual increment ... truthful, it is the respondents who have infringed Rule FR 21 (a). Even FR
24 was quoted by the respondents to defend their decision
there are no other changes in regard
to allowing annual increments. FR 24 and FR 26 support the cause of the
applicants. Annual increment ... truthful, it is the respondents who have infringed Rule FR 21 (a). Even FR
24 was quoted by the respondents to defend their decision
there are no other changes in regard
to allowing annual increments. FR 24 and FR 26 support the cause of the
applicants. Annual increment ... truthful, it is the respondents who have infringed Rule FR 21 (a). Even FR
24 was quoted by the respondents to defend their decision
