found his case fit for retirement under the FR 56 (j).
The Review Committee, constituted in terms of the aforesaid circular,
examined the report ... relevant
documents and recommended for applicant's retirement under FR
56(j) and Respondent No. 3 issued the impugned order on
29.04.2021 retiring
passed under Fundamental Rule 56 (j) [hereinafter referred to as 'FR 56(j)'] whereby he was compulsorily retired from service. In the said ... petitioner has submitted that the power exercised by the respondents under FR 56 (j) compulsorily retiring the petitioner has not been exercised in a bona
contend that there is no material
available on record for invoking FR 56(2). The punishment of stoppage of
increment with cumulative effect for five ... Judicial Officers to
perform their duties. Therefore, the ground for invoking FR 56(2) is
untenable. A single incident of imposing punishment, cannot
waited for completion of the proceeding rather than taking recourse
of FR 56(J). Applicant has also contested the validity of impugned
order for violation ... Screening Committee
recommended for compulsory retirement of the applicant under FR
56(J) and Respondent No. 4 in exercise of powers conferred under FR
56
been issued
subsequent to the order dated 10.06.2019, whereby
invoking the FR 56(j), the applicant has been retired
from service.
2.2 The applicant submits ... ITAT, Rajkot, where
he was compulsorily retired from service under FR
56(j) w.e.f. 11-06-2019.
2.3 It is submitted that throughout
Respondents to grant
weightage to the Petitioner as provided in FR 56 (3) (d) (i) & (ii) consequent
on his voluntary retirement on 09.11.2001 from ... Board
ought to have extended benefit of weightage in terms of FR 56 (3) (d) (i) &
(ii), which if extended to the petitioner
Head
Constable on 08.07.2011. It is submitted that as
per FR- 56 (J) read with Rule-48 of CCS (Pension)
Rules, 1972, the superannuation review ... retention in service beyond 30 years,
is taken under the FR 56(J) read with Rule
48(1) (B) of the CCS (Pension) Rules relied
regard, the Court is inclined to refer to the provisions of FR
56, which is quoted below:
"F.R.56. (a) The date ... earlier."
8. From the above, it is seen from the FR 56(c) that any government
servant, who has given notice of not less
Jotendro, learned Senior counsel appearing for the
petitioner submitted that under FR 56 (k)(1) of the FR & SR, it is provided
that ... from service
w.e.f. 01-10-2021, as provided under FR 56 (k)(1).
[6] Mr. N. Kumarjit, learned Advocate General Manipur appearing
Central Government
Employees for strengthening of administration under Fundamental Rule
(FR) 56(j)/(l) and Rule 48 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 which reads ... Central Government Employees for
strengthening of administration under Fundamental Rule
(FR) 56(j)/(l) and Rule 48 of CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972.
Instructions have been
