come in the way of authority acting under the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 in declaring some sale transaction ... transaction in contravention of the provisions of the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 [hereinafter referred
longstanding use by the appellants.
39. Mr. Datta submits that a word fragment of the word which
denotes the ingredient/pharmaceutical substance ... 2008 Page 26 of 64
that even if the word fragment is publici juris, such word fragment may
acquire distinctiveness for that pharmaceutical substance
challenging the vires of The East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation
and Prevention of Fragmentation) Amendment Act, 2007 (Punjab Act No. 6
of 2007) and the consequential ... Authorities under The East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and
Prevention of Fragmentation
selling the land, under the 'Karnataka Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act', 1966 (hereinafter referred ... regular sale deed as soon as the ban on registering the fragmented land is lifted as stated in para 2 of the plaint?
2. Whether
time being in force providing for the prevention of fragmentation of agricultural holdings or for the fixation of ceilings or for the devolution of tenancy ... which is in force if it provides for the prevention of fragmentation of agricultural holdings or for the fixation of ceilings or for the devolution
Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson ... vs Intex Technologies (India) Limited on 13 March, 2015
Author: Manmohan Singh
with Writ Petition
(C)No.28496/2016 for a declaration that the fragmentation
and sale of Kinalur estate, (hereinafter referred to as the
estate ... agreement itself
is illegal as it was made with an intention to fragment the
estate and to sell it to strangers under the guise
East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Act (No. 50 of 1948)--hereinafter called the Consolidation Act--as per notification No. 57-G/17943 ... East Punjab Holdings (Consolidation and Prevention of Fragmentation) Rules were made in 1949 and rule 16 which was added by Punjab Government notification
Anand Kumar And Ors vs State Of Haryana on 15 February, 2019
Author: Avneesh Jhingan
Ahmedabad/12 of 1995 under the provisions of the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred ... team was of the view that the land in question was a fragment and, therefore, the proceedings were initiated by the Deputy Collector
