would clearly
indicate that the FRANCHISEE therein namely
defendant had approached the FRANCHISOR namely
plaintiff for a licence to operate a restaurant in the
name ... agreement,
whereunder the use of Trademark "Adigas" is with the
franchisor and when franchisor alleges either improper
use or misuse or passing
disputes and differences arising
between the parties hereto as also between the
Franchisor and the Franchisee, including any dispute
or difference in regard ... disputes and differences arising
between the parties hereto as also between the
Franchisor and the Franchisee, including any dispute
or difference in regard
disputes and differences arising
between the parties hereto as also between the
Franchisor and the Franchisee, including any dispute
or difference in regard ... disputes
shall be referred to sole arbitrator to be nominated
by Franchisor. The sole arbitrator shall have
summary powers and shall be bound to give
Provider as partners or as creating the
relationships of employer/employee,
franchisor/franchisee, or principal/agent between the
parties.
EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT AND CONTROLLING
Provider as partners or as creating the
relationships of employer/employee,
franchisor/franchisee, or principal/agent between the
parties.
EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT AND CONTROLLING
Provider as partners or as creating the
relationships of employer/employee,
franchisor/franchisee, or principal/agent between the
parties.
EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT AND CONTROLLING
Provider as partners or as creating the
relationships of employer/employee,
franchisor/franchisee, or principal/agent between the
parties.
EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT AND CONTROLLING
Provider as partners or as creating the
relationships of employer/employee,
franchisor/franchisee, or principal/agent between the
parties.
EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT AND CONTROLLING
Provider as partners or as creating the
relationships of employer/employee,
franchisor/franchisee, or principal/agent between the
parties.
EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT AND CONTROLLING
defendant claimed that the
plaintiff had sub-let the premises to the franchisor and
therefore, the plaintiff was not entitled to any relief. He
also ... possession of the property in question was delivered to the
franchisor of the plaintiff and therefore, the agency fee
payable under the said franchise agreement
