ground. It was a case where fraud was made upon court. Concealment in filing case also amounts to fraud. Relevant paragraph of the case ... appeal, revision, writ or even in collateral proceedings.'
The court defined "fraud" as an act of deliberate deception with the design
within the category of fraud, cheating and criminal breach of
trust by a public servant which are primary offence defined under
provisions ... accused persons also being one that
falls within the definition of cheating, fraud and criminal breach of trust by
a public servant, offence which otherwise
factually it is clear and certain
that respondents have committed blunder and
fraud and tried to snatch away the possession
of the suit property from ... been opined that fraud and collusion vitiate
even the most solemn proceedings in any
civilised system of jurisprudence. It has
been defined
public at large that the said document was executed to prevent fraud and forgery and to secure a reliable, comprehensive and complete account ... misused his status/position and was a privy to the fraud.
34.Besides this, it cannot be forgotten that Section 81 of the Registration
public at large that the said document was executed to prevent fraud and forgery and to secure a reliable, comprehensive and complete account ... misused his status/position and was a privy to the fraud.
34.Besides this, it cannot be forgotten that Section 81 of the Registration
circumstances does not exist. The keeping back of such circumstances is a fraud, and therefore the policy is void. Although the suppression should happen through ... contrary."
17. The term "material fact" is not defined in the Act and, therefore, it has been understood and explained
replied that the nomenclature "heinous crime" has not been
defined in the CBI Manual. He orally tried to satisfy that such cases ... that it is not possible to determine whether the offences
of cheating, fraud and forgery come in the category of heinous crime
other form of
coercion, or
Thirdlyby abduction, or
Fourthlyby practicing fraud, or deception, or
Fifthlyby abuse of power, or
Sixthlyby inducement ... purpose of exploitation.
Although, the word exploitation has not been defined in the
section but by way of explanation, it has been mentioned that
relevant for the purpose of this case.
20. Section 463 IPC defines Forgery as under:-
"Whoever makes any false documents or false electronic
record ... enter into any express or implied
contract, or with intent to commit fraud or that fraud may be
committed commits forgery."
State v. Manish
Dr. Rini Johar & Anr. vs State Of M.P.&Ors.; on 3 June