itself is void. He has also referred the definition of 'fraud'
defined under Sec.17 of Indian Contract Act and argued that
statement has
taken a contention that the Painting is an antique as
defined under Section 2 I(a)(i) of the Antiquities and Art
Treasures ... contract of sale between the
plaintiffs and defendant No.1 voidable for fraud and
misrepresentation. After the said Painting was put into
possession of these
said either illegal or contrary to Public
Policy of India as defined in the Act.
26. It would be relevant herein to make
mention ... making of the award was induced or
affected by fraud or corruption or was in
violation of Section 75 or Section
State By Cbi/Acb vs Sri. M.S.Seetharama Rao on 21 March, 2016
IN
State By Cbi/Acb vs ) Sri Sanjay Shivaji Mahendrakar @ on 18 April, 2016
IN THE
Central Bureau Of Investigation vs Late Sri.K.A.Subramanya on 29 September, 2016
IN
Central Bureau Of vs Sri.U.A.Chandramouli on 30 July, 2016
IN THE COURT
Central Bureau Of Investigation vs Sri.A.E.Devendranath on 31 August, 2016
IN THE
Central Bureau Of Investigation vs Sri.Hirachand S.Tukol on 11 February, 2016
IN THE
Smt. Uma Rao vs State By Cbi/Acb/Bangalore on 27 January, 2016
IN THE