abuse of process of Court" of course has not
been defined or given any meaning in the Code of Civil
Procedure . However, a party ... authority of the Court by a party or
stranger.
(3) Fraud or collusion in Court proceedings as between
parties.
(4) Retention of a benefit wrongly
granting the injunction, as the appellant's had played fraud.
19. Fraud is defined in Section 17 of the Indian Contract ... following terms:
"Fraud defined.- Fraud means and includes any of the following acts
committed by a party to a contract, or with his connivance
perused, it is manifest that the plea of mis-representation
and fraud has specifically been taken.
11. This Court in Smt. Kala Wati ... Fraud,
held as under:
"13. Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, (hereinafter
referred to as the `Act')deals with fraud defining
something. The meaning of fraud is
required to be elaborated hereunder :
"Fraud means an intrinsic, collateral act, and fraud
of an egregious nature would ... induce him to enter into the
contract.
8. Now, 'fraud' is defined in Section 17 of the India
Contract Act, 1872, which runs
lucidly dealt
and it was held as under:
"............The allegation of fraud, coercion and undue influence could
not be proved by the plaintiffs ... Indian Contract Act,
1872 and was as a result of fraud as defined under Section 1 of the Act.
The ratio of the judgment
lucidly dealt and it was held as under:
"............The allegation of fraud, coercion and undue influence
could not be proved by the plaintiffs ... Indian Contract Act, 1872 and was as a result of fraud
as defined under Section 1 of the Act. The ratio of the judgment
lucidly dealt and it was held as under:
"............The allegation of fraud, coercion and undue influence
could not be proved by the plaintiffs ... Indian Contract Act, 1872 and was as a result of fraud
as defined under Section 1 of the Act. The ratio of the judgment
lucidly dealt and it was held as under:
"............The allegation of fraud, coercion and undue influence
could not be proved by the plaintiffs ... Indian Contract Act, 1872 and was as a result of fraud
as defined under Section 1 of the Act. The ratio of the judgment
Sangat Ram And Another vs Harsh Krishan on 11 December, 2017
Author: Tarlok Singh Chauhan
they are based on complete misreading of the
material evidence ; and fraud and mis-representation that has
been practiced by the defendants upon the plaintiff ... Indian
Contract Act, 1872 and was as a result of fraud as defined
under Section 1 of the Act. The ratio of the judgment
