Apex Court defined fraud as
trickery and concealment of material facts.
38. This Court does not find that the arbitral award was induced by
fraud ... showing that the award
was induced by fraud or corruption. Fraud and corruption have not been
defined in the said Act.
26. The Oxford dictionary
showing that the award was induced by fraud or corruption. Fraud
and corruption have not been defined in the said Act.
45. In the decision ... Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act, defines fraud as
follows:-
17. 'Fraud' defined.--
"Fraud' means and includes
showing that the award was induced by fraud or corruption. Fraud
and corruption have not been defined in the said Act.
48. In the decision ... Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act, defines fraud as
follows:-
17. 'Fraud' defined.--
"Fraud' means and includes
decision of S.P.
Chengalavariya Naidu (supra), in which fraud has been defined
as an act of deliberate deception with the design of securing
something ... Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act, defines fraud as
follows:-
17. 'Fraud' defined.--
"Fraud' means and includes
denned in Section 15 or undue influence as defined in Section 16 or fraud as denned in Rule 17 or misrepresentation as defined in Section ... refer to Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act which defines fraud and which states that fraud means and includes any of the following acts
suit brought on a similar
contract no registered.]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 "Fraud" defined.
[ Section 17 : Fraud means and includes any of the following acts committed
creditworthy document to impeach the fraud. The fraud as envisaged by Section 25(iii) of the Special Marriage Act, 1954, has its absolute mooring ... Indian Contral Act, 1872. Section 17 of the Indian Contract Act defines fraud which has been categorised as follow :--
(a) the suggestion
civil nature and completely different from the offence of fraud as defined in the Indian Penal Code . He also points out that there ... find out as to whether the applicant was guilty of fraud as defined in the Indian Penal Code and determine the same beyond all reasonable
Section 17 of the Contract Act was relied
upon that would define "fraud". In the present case, Mr.
Bhattacharya would draw reference from
fraud as defined under Indian Contract Act . He referred to S. 17 of the Indian Contract Act which defines fraud and took into consideration
