that since it is a case of
fraud, limitation will run from the date of knowledge of fraud. Relying
22/44
::: Uploaded ... Limitation Act lays down the cardinal principle that fraud nullifies
everything. He also placed reliance on the decision of the Supreme
Court in Ram Chandra
submission of the learned counsel for the Applicants
is that fraud vitiates everything. It has been contended that no
release deeds were executed ... Customs v.
Candid Enterprises (supra), the Apex Court has held that fraud
nullifies everything. There is no quarrel with the proposition.
However, the disputed questions
2022.doc
certified fraudulently. Instead of considering the allegations of fraud clearly
attributable to Respondent Nos.1 and 2, the authorities below proceeded ... which is enshrined in Section
17 of the Limitation Act that fraud nullifies everything. If the Tribunal was satisfied,
as it ought to have been
Sheoshankar vs State Govt. Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors. on 18 April, 1951
Equivalent citations
Jalgaon Janta Sahakari Bank Ltd. And Anr vs Joint Commissioner Of Sales Tax Nodal 9
State Bank Of India And 9 Ors vs State Of Maharashtra And 9 Ors on
Fakirchand Motichand vs Motichand Hurruckchand on 30 August, 1883
Equivalent citations: (1883)ILR 7BOM438
JUDGMENT
Walchandnagar Industries Limited ... vs Dattusingh Lalsing Pardeshi And Ors. ... on 20 October, 2005
Equivalent citations
Govind Narayan Kakade vs Rangnath Gopal Rajopadhye on 20 November, 1929
Equivalent citations: (1930)32BOMLR232
Vijay Krishna Kumbhar vs The State Of Maharashtra & Others on 15 March, 1999
Equivalent
