Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

enshrined in Section 17 of the Limitation Act, which was, that fraud nullified everything. I am at a loss to understand as to how such

which is enshrined in Section 17 of the Limitation Act that fraud nullifies everything. If the Tribunal was satisfied, as it ought to have been ... Section 17 of the Limitation Act and also the principle that fraud nullifies everything. Thus I am constrained to set aside the impugned order dated

received by defendant No.7 under illegal and fraudulent circumstances. Since fraud nullifies everything and the appellant/defendant No.1 has otherwise to reimburse/compensate

court held that as the order impugned was based upon fraud which nullifies everything, therefore, the Tribunal ought to have condoned the delay

court held that as the order impugned was based upon fraud which nullifies everything, therefore, the Tribunal ought to have condoned the delay

itself, with the relevant institute cargo clauses would be vitiated and nullified by fraud by the opposite party no.1 as the law has been ... applicants from all aspects including the question of repudiation. However, knowing everything, the opposite party no.1 has deliberately failed/omitted and/or neglected

Hare Krishna Sen vs Umesh Chandra Dutt And Ors. on 26 April, 1921 Equivalent citations

Govind Narayan Kakade vs Rangnath Gopal Rajopadhye on 20 November, 1929 Equivalent citations: (1930)32BOMLR232

Sh.Prem Nath Chopra Deceased Thru Lrs vs Sh.Arun Chopra & Ors. on 26

Mahant Krishna Dayal Gir vs Syed Abdul Gaffur And Anr. on 27 March, 1917 Equivalent