plaint further sets out that there was a fraud on the registration law in that there was included in the sale-deed a vacant land ... sale or mortgage, he cannot be held to commit a fraud on registration which would render the whole transaction invalid. Rulings of the Bombay, Patna
Registrar’s Office at Olavakkode, Palakad District in Kerala, amounts to
fraud on registration and is in violation of Section 28 of the Registration ... Registration of Ex.B9
at Kerala would amount to fraud on registration and hence the sale deed
would not confer any title
fraud between the parties to the document is
established by cogent evidence, the sale deed can be termed as a fraud on
registration ... registration, being a device to
evade the Registration Act , and the registration obtained in such a way is not
valid. There being no effective registration
under Section 28 of the Registration Act since the plaintiff practised fraud on registration inasmuch as the sale deed was registered at Cuttack by inclusion ... registration, being a device to evade the Registration Act , and the registration obtained in such a way is not valid. There being no effective registration
dismissed on two reasons; one was that the plaintiffs had practised fraud on registration by including plots 1 and 25 situate in Rajmahal Sub-division ... will hardly be
very much relevant on the question of alleged fraud in registration unless it is established that defendants 7 to 10 fraudulently inserted
Registration” are enumerated. Section 32 of the
Registration Act denotes “Persons to present documents for Registration”.
Section 32-A of the Registration denotes “Registration ... Fraud” in common parlance. “Fraud” is an offence in general. Threefold
actions are permissible for the offence of fraud. The Statutory fraud
cent of land in Bajaragada included therein and this being a fraud on registration, no title to the said property did pass ... pass to the plaintiff, the reason being that it was a fraud
on registration. With regard to other issues, the court answered the same
defendant No. 1 but for the fact that the evidence disclosed fraud on registration by the vendor and vendee of the sale deed dated ... registration if however pirties have acted bona fide without any fraudulent intention, the registration would not be vitiated.
8. The burden of establishing fraudulent registration
owned by the first defendant. The documents
was termed as fraud on registration. It is also claimed that the first
defendant has validly cancelled ... cannot be concluded that it is a result of fraud on registration.
Consequently, the Courts below found that the cancellation deed
dated 30.03.2006 is invalid
owned by the first defendant. The documents
was termed as fraud on registration. It is also claimed that the first
defendant has validly cancelled ... cannot be concluded that it is a result of fraud on registration.
Consequently, the Courts below found that the cancellation deed
dated 30.03.2006 is invalid
