Section 210 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
210. Fraudulently obtaining decree for sum not due.—
Whoever fraudulently obtains a decree or order against ... interest in property to which he is not entitled, or fraudulently causes a decree or order to be executed against any person after
Section 208 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860
208. Fraudulently suffering decree for sum not due.—
Whoever fraudulently causes or suffers a decree or order ... knowing that A is likely to obtain a decree against him, fraudulently suffers a judgment to pass against him for a larger amount
whole of the proceedings in execution, therefore, spring from a fraudulent decree pronounced, according to the findings of the courts below, by the fraud ... decree of the Alipore Court passing a decree upon an award to which the consent of the plaintiff, a pardanashin lady, had been fraudulently obtained
Every decree is presumed
to be valid and unless otherwise proved, the decree is good
and binding on the parties to the decree ... settled law that a decree, whether it be a consent decree,
or an ex parte decree or a decree passed after contest,
can be impeached
suit for setting
aside the ex parte decree is maintainable.
● Where a decree is fraudulently obtained, the doctrine of res judicata does
not operate ... fraudulent decree. In order the decree passed in O. S.67 of
1997 must be considered fraudulent, there must be something more than mere
plaintiff in O.S.No.4595/2004 is a
collusive and fraudulent decree to defeat the right of the
contesting parties. It is contended that ... favour. It is also
contended that it is a fraudulent decree to defeat the right of the
contesting parties and therefore fraud vitiates the justice
plaintiff in O.S.No.4595/2004 is a
collusive and fraudulent decree to defeat the right of the
contesting parties. It is contended that ... favour. It is also
contended that it is a fraudulent decree to defeat the right of the
contesting parties and therefore fraud vitiates the justice
plaintiff in O.S.No.4595/2004 is a
collusive and fraudulent decree to defeat the right of the
contesting parties. It is contended that ... favour. It is also
contended that it is a fraudulent decree to defeat the right of the
contesting parties and therefore fraud vitiates the justice
plaintiff in O.S.No.4595/2004 is a
collusive and fraudulent decree to defeat the right of the
contesting parties. It is contended that ... favour. It is also
contended that it is a fraudulent decree to defeat the right of the
contesting parties and therefore fraud vitiates the justice
plaintiff in O.S.No.4595/2004 is a
collusive and fraudulent decree to defeat the right of the
contesting parties. It is contended that ... favour. It is also
contended that it is a fraudulent decree to defeat the right of the
contesting parties and therefore fraud vitiates the justice
