Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14693 (2.51 seconds)

Sri Tanay Das vs The State Of Tripura on 2 May, 2022

Section 3 of TPID Act provides as under:- "Conviction for Fraudulent default- 3. Any Financial Establishment which (i) fraudulently defaults any repayment of deposit ... same when needed, shall be deemed to have committed a default fraudulently or Failed to render specific service fraudulently. 15. Section 406 of IPC prescribes
Tripura High Court Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - A Lodh - Full Document

Amit Kumar Shrivastava vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 1 July, 2024

defines ‘financial establishment’. Section 2(i) defines ‘fraudulent default’. The same reads thus: “Fraudulent default” means any financial establishment, which fraudulently defaults any repayment ... punishment for defaults by financial establishment. Section 10 reads thus: “Punishment for defaults by financial establishment– Where any financial establishment fraudulently defaults or any financial
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mrs.S.Bagavathy vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 2 March, 2007

clutches of financial establishments, who have committed a deliberate and fraudulent default in repayment of the principal and the interest after maturity, and to provide ... money should come back to the depositors and the fraudulent defaults should be rectified by such attachment, auction sale and realization. 6.12. Alternatively
Madras High Court Cites 142 - Cited by 20 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next