District Registrar, Registration Department of Karaikudi District, to cancel the fraudulent Document No.1408/2007. In the said complaint, he had stated that the sixth ... make a note in the Index-II of the document which was fraudulently registered to the effect that the "registration is annulled
note, this Court is of the considered view that in the said document, there is no signature of P.W.2 seen thereto (second witness ... that the same was fraudulently filled up by the Appellant / Complainant as per his liking and a fraudulent document was created with false details
comply the mandatory provisions for supplying the copy of the plaint and document relied upon and Or.XXXIX Rule 3, Civil Procedure Code the injunction ... coming to Court with false case with aid of false and fraudulent document should be thrown out at threshold, etc., and that the Court
where there is an allegation of presentation of forged or fraudulent documents.'
He also draws the attention of this Court to the decision
Thus, a large scale fraud has been played and even the documents are fraudulent in nature. In such circumstances, no payment under ... that a large scale fraud has been played and even the documents are fraudulent in nature, and under the circumstances, the order of the learned
litigant and it is his habitual practice to create false and fraudulent
documents by impersonating others and by committing forgery with intend to get
illegal ... true and valid document. No
consideration has been passed in the aforesaid sale deed. It is fraudulently a
created one.
8. The suit property
admissible in evidence namely that it is a fraudulent document executed by the
second Respondent/first Defendant, long after extinction of all his interests
alia stating that "....... But
the accused conspired together and executed documents, fraudulently regarding
this property and thereby, committed the offences
documents, which are required for
the purpose of registration of the Document, under the Registration Act,
1908 . Indeed, the Third Respondent had returned the documents ... challenging the aforesaid Document No.469/2014. Since, it is a
fraudulent document, he lodged a complaint, in terms of ingredients of
Circular
Respondent in accordance with
Circular No.67, dated 03.11.2011 for fraudulent registration by considering
the Petitioner's representation dated 16.09.2014 within the period that ... therefore, he applied for Encumbrance Certificate and
found that a fraudulent document was executed by his daughter Subaithambal
Natchiyar to her son and daughter