plaintiff to show that the
agreement was a fraudulent document and also that
misrepresentation or fraud was practiced in the suit. He had
to necessarily ... character of the document, then the document
would be void and a suit for setting aside the document
buy recourse
Additional Sub
Registrar's Office, Kottayam, are false and
fraudulent documents created by the defendants
without any authority and that they are not binding ... cast on their rights by the defendants by
creating false and fraudulent documents and also by grabbing possession,
the plaintiffs had to approach the court
argued that if a document writer has attested the document,
it must be proved by the beneficiary of the document that he
had the animus ... document, then the document would be void
S.A.No.86 of 2001 22
and a suit for setting aside the document by recourse
clear distinction
between fraudulent misrepresentation as to the
character of the document and fraudulent
misrepresentation as to the contents thereof. With
reference to the former ... clear distinction between
fraudulent misrepresentation as to the character of
the document and fraudulent misrepresentation as to
the contents thereof. With reference to the former
extents of land in Munnar on the
basis of sham and fraudulent documents of title namely Document
Nos.380/1976 and 381/1976 ... been illegally grabbed by
the company based on the said fraudulent document. Since the entire
transaction is based on fraud, misrepresentation and grabbing
findings. It is contended that the date of knowledge of the fraudulent
document is material while considering the question of limitation.
8. The second appeal ... admits Ext.A1 as a genuine document. If his case was that the
document was obtained fraudulently, there was no reason for even
purchase certificates in
the name of the 2nd defendant are fraudulent documents and do not bind
the church and its properties.
3. Defendants ... position
as managing trustee and helped other defendants to create the fraudulent
documents. According to the learned counsel for the plaintiff, item
written statement that
Ext.A1 sale deed is a fraudulent document, the trial
court should have decided whether it is a fraudulent
document. Learned ... sell and the document relied on by
the appellant is a fraudulent document and by that
document appellant did not derive any title. When
defendant
defendant chose
to cancel Ext.A1 document by Ext.A4 document and then
executed another document Ext.A3, dated 24.12.2006 in
favour ... suit. It is also contended that it was a fraudulent
document brought about by the plaintiff concealing the true
facts from the donor namely
possession of a tenant by name Mohammed Ashraf, was a
fraudulent document. The learned counsel submitted on the
basis of the daily book register maintained ... found to be
a fraudulent document. Ext.A4(a) is seen executed on stamp
paper issued in favour of Sri.Moahmmed Ashraf whereas
