Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

against four accused persons alleging that they had prepared fake and fraudulent documents. The second FIR came to be registered on the basis

Delhi and along with the application, said Shri Harpreet Singh annexed various documents; Shri Harpreet Singh claimed himself to be the owner of a firm ... were fraudulent and that he paid a sum of ₹.1,00,000/- to an individual named Navneet Singh for the said fraudulent documents and would

24th March, 1986 from the Government of India by dishonestly and/or fraudulently concealing, in their letter dated 10th March, 1986, the fact that they ... between Bofors and Svenska Inc is a dishonestly or fraudulently created false document. (xiv) The conduct of concerned employees of Bofors and the other concerned

changes in the document. How the document is changed is not for us to explain. However, whosoever may have changed those documents, the said change ... document or part of a document can be said to have made a false document. A person is said to do a thing fraudulently

document or part of a document with the intention of causing it to be believed that such document or part of document was made, signed ... documents or a part of document with an intention of posing it to be believe that such document or part of a document was signed

name and has also forged my signature and fraudulently and dishonestly used the said document as genuine in the office of AETC, Shimla. AETC Sirmaur ... they did not register any FIR till date. As the fraudulent documents have been prepared at UNA, hence FIR required to be registered

Security Officer-Investigatins Vice Consul U. S. Embassy, New Delhi Subject: Fraudulent Documents Submitted to American Embassy New Delhi in Support of U. S. Immigrant ... immigrant visa in 2002. SUBJECT stated that he received the fraudulent Indian passport (F6536975) in the name of Shiv SINGH from Shiv's widow

material on record that the said certificate is a fraudulent document. Petitioner has lodged FIR against respondent no.2 and others under Section

installed second hand machinery and bills of purchase are fraudulent 5 documents. The petitioner had inspected the plaint. On several occasions. The petitioner had noticed

1882/19 & 1883/19. Accordingly on the basis of the document submitted by the proposed borrowers and after their verification by the concerned officials ... fake and forged. Alleging deception by the borrowers by submission of fraudulent documents, the FIR has been lodged. 4. It has been projected on behalf