Sharma and accused no. 4 Gurbhej Singh
then used these forged documents fraudulently and dishonestly as
genuine and accused no.1 Rakesh Kumar in furtherance ... having reasons to believe the same to be forged documents, and have
dishonestly and fraudulently used them as genuine.
[ C.C. No.01/2019 State
Cbi vs Rama Nand Gupta Etc on 23 August, 2019
IN THE COURT OF SHRI
person
with confirmed residential proof, the attorney on the basis of fraudulent
document shall not be allowed to continue with the matter. The plaintiff
with
Making a false document.--A person is said
to make a false document or false electronic
record First.--Who dishonestly or fraudulently
"(a) makes ... first category of
`false documents', it is not sufficient that a
document has been made or executed dishonestly or
fraudulently. There is a further
Making a false document: - A person is said to
make a false document or false electronic record -
First - Who dishonestly or fraudulently -
(a) makes, signs ... forgery the documents must
be made dishonestly or fraudulently.
But dishonest or fraudulent are not tautological. Fraudulent
does not imply the deprivation of property
abovesaid forged documents knowing and having reason to believe
them to be forged documents and the accused Pravjot retained those
forged documents for the purpose ... State Vs. Jasvinder Singh etc 13 / 17
fraudulently, alters a document in any material part, without lawful
authority; (iii) he altered or tampered a document
Making a false document.--A person is said
to make a false document or false electronic
record First.--Who dishonestly or fraudulently
"(a) makes ... first category of
`false documents', it is not sufficient that a
document has been made or executed dishonestly or
fraudulently. There is a further
document or the authenticity of the digital signature,
with the intention of causing it to be believed that
such document or a part of document ... first is where a person dishonestly or
fraudulently makes or executes a document with
the intention of causing it to be believed that such
document
power to look
into the legality, validity or genuinity of the document, more particularly
the Will. It is stated that plaintiff has preferred an appeal ... Since Will dated 16.12.1988,
cannot be declared as an ingenuine and fraudulent document, therefore, no
decree of declaration can be passed in respect
means of fraudulently making
Sunita Sinha & Anr Vs. M/s Leela Builders Pvt Ltd & Ors Page 6 of 34
false documents ... year 1992 is based on
fraudulent documents which could not have been done as the title
stood transferred to the defendants in the year
