These documents cannot be taken into consideration.
Even the document Ex.D7 is also subsequent to the suit. The
documents ... These documents will not
helpful to the defendants. Because they have got the documents
during the pendency of the suit on the alleged fraudulent
document
documents. The prosecution has to prove that the
documents which accused produced to be employed in Holland Line
Corporation of USA is fake and fraudulent ... accused. Among these documents Ex.P8 is the material document. It
is alleged that accused had obtained Visa by fraudulent means
defendant in favour of the 2nd
defendant, as sham and fraudulent document and not binding
on the plaintiff, consequently to declare that the charge created ... played fraud on the 4th defendant and on the
strength of fraudulent document, he has availed the loan from
the bank. There is no valid
agreement in the year
1974 with respondent no.2 was itself fraudulent document. The said alleged
agreement was not even registered. The respondent ... would clearly indicate that even those two agreements are
fraudulent documents. The respondent no.1 has not produced any proof of any
consideration received from
agreement in the year
1974 with respondent no.2 was itself fraudulent document. The said alleged
agreement was not even registered. The respondent ... would clearly indicate that even those two agreements are
fraudulent documents. The respondent no.1 has not produced any proof of any
consideration received from
agreement in the year
1974 with respondent no.2 was itself fraudulent document. The said alleged
agreement was not even registered. The respondent ... would clearly indicate that even those two agreements are
fraudulent documents. The respondent no.1 has not produced any proof of any
consideration received from
Court rejected the argument based on
the gift deed being a fraudulent document or that was no period of limitation
prescribed for challenging the alleged ... fraudulent document. The Court
reasoned that even assuming that the gift deed was obtained by fraud, still
the plaintiffs will have to challenge the same
dated
09.02.2015. But the second respondent has declined to cancel the fraudulent
documents stating that the said Circular No.67 of 2011 issued ... that
based on the enquiry conducted by the second respondent, the fraudulent
documents have to be cancelled.
4. The learned Additional Government Pleader appearing
also
taken the view that the same is not a fraudulent document. It is submitted by her that the
learned Lower Appellate Court, in perverse ... Principal of the school, to be a fabricated and fraudulent document. It is to be noted that
the transfer certificate was issued in the year
Whoever, provides incorrect information, fabricated and fake books of accounts, fraudulent documents, and such other evidence etc., to the authorities, whether
