Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 7168 (1.08 seconds)

Renuka Devi vs D. Manohara on 18 November, 1997

order is that the respondent has come to court with a fraudulent document so as to deprive another person of her property. Even though ... dismissed, if he continues in possession on the basis of the fraudulent document, is not the court impliedly holding him to continue in possession
Madras High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 19 - Full Document

T.S.Sundaram vs State By on 26 April, 2010

were made. It was then identified that the documents produced were false and fabricated documents. The original document of the Anna Nagar House Property ... marked as Ex.P-12 and the duplicate or fraudulent document was marked as Ex.P-13. PW-2 the actual S.P.Dayanidhi categorically
Madras High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

T.S.Sundaram vs State By on 26 April, 2010

were made. It was then identified that the documents produced were false and fabricated documents. The original document of the Anna Nagar House Property ... marked as Ex.P-12 and the duplicate or fraudulent document was marked as Ex.P-13. PW-2 the actual S.P.Dayanidhi categorically
Madras High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Natarajan vs M.Ravi

name, Ramasamy Mudaliar seeking a declaration that the othi was a fraudulent document. After trial, the Court held that the alleged othi ... suit property. It was claimed that the defendant had created fraudulent documents in collusion with Veeramalai Muthuraja and S.K.Samy Iyer and others
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next