respectively. In the plaint he challenged Exs. 9 and 10 as fraudulent documents and prayed for cancellation thereof. He prayed for a declaration that ... there can be no question that Ex. 10 was a fraudulent document. In his application for guardianship Mohendra admitted the properties covered
appellant. According to the appellant the said experience certificate is a
fraudulent document and in this regard they seek to rely upon certain
communication sent ... opined that the allegation of producing false or fabricated or fraudulent
documents need to be examined. One more matter which needs to be taken
note
defendant never agreed and that those terms were embodied in the documents fraudulently at the instance of the plaintiff with the intention of defrauding ... that the judgments arid decrees based upon such a forged document fraudulently obtained are themselves nullities.
8. On the 24th April, 1922, the Subordinate Judge
documents were being presented by the beneficiary himself and (ii) the bank knows the documents are presented that they are forged or fraudulent. The case ... only did not decline to accept the documents on the ground that the documents were forged or fraudulent, but actually confirmed that payment will
reason to believe that it was a forged document.
14. A forged document is a false document made wholly or in part by forgery ( Section ... said to make a false document who dishonestly or fraudulently makes a document with the intention of causing it to be believed that such document
being fraudulently issued. In order to prove his allegation, he had led the Court through various documents annexed with the petition. He had taken many ... nullity. The negotiating bank did not acquire any right under a fraudulent document. LC is issued against shipping documents. But, in this case there
dated 14th July, 1952. Ranjan in collusion with the other documents and with fraudulent motive told Achutananda that they would ... They also deny that they in collusion with each other fraudulently got the documents dated 22nd December, 1953 and 28th December, 1953 executed through Achudananda
Indian Penal Code. In using this document, if they had no fraudulent or dishonest intention, they cannot be guilty under Section 471 of the Indian ... Officer, and therefore it cannot be said that they used the document 'fraudulently,' as defined in Section 25 of the Indian Penal Code
does not believe it to be true. They were false and fraudulent documents, brought into being for the purpose of deceiving persons to whom ... have no doubt that the making and the exhibition of those documents to the plaintiff were fraud within 'meaning of Section 17 , Contract
could be said to have arisen in Bombay was that the fraudulent document took effect against the plaintiff's interest in Bombay ... deposit with the Calcutta Improvement Trust Tribunal. Clearly, therefore, the fraudulent document took effect against the plaintiffs' interest at the place where the money